Current:Home > NewsThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -MoneySpot
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-17 06:39:32
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (91919)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Ukraine moves its Christmas Day holiday in effort to abandon the Russian heritage
- Multiple people taken to hospitals after commercial building fire in Phoenix suburb
- Angus Cloud, of Euphoria fame, dead at 25
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Alabama Senator says she is recovering after sudden numbness in her face
- Ukraine moves its Christmas Day holiday in effort to abandon the Russian heritage
- After the death of his wife, actor Richard E. Grant vowed to find joy every day
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Jury begins weighing death penalty or life in prison for Pittsburgh synagogue shooter
Ranking
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Beauty on a Budget: The Best Rated Drugstore Foundations You Can Find on Amazon for Amazing Skin
- Fate of American nurse and child reportedly kidnapped in Haiti still unknown
- Mother of former missing Arizona teen asks the public to move on in new video
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Invasive fruit fly infestation puts Los Angeles neighborhood under quarantine
- Western Michigan man gets life for striking woman with pickup, leaving body in woods
- Russia accuses Ukraine of a drone attack on Moscow that hit the same building just days ago
Recommendation
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
'Narrow opportunity' to restore democracy in Niger after attempted coup: US official
California woman's 1991 killer identified after DNA left under victim's fingernails
ACLU of Indiana asks state’s high court to keep hold on near-total abortion ban in place for now
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Chatbots sometimes make things up. Not everyone thinks AI’s hallucination problem is fixable
30 dogs and puppies found dead, 90 rescued from unlivable conditions at Ohio homes
China accuses U.S. of turning Taiwan into powder keg after White House announces new military aid package