Current:Home > MyThis Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early -MoneySpot
This Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early
View
Date:2025-04-15 18:28:48
Don't claim Social Security early for the wrong reasons
Many Americans fear for the future of Social Security, and this could be leading them to make some bad choices.
In fact, one recent study showed 44% of people think Social Security is going to run out of money before their retirement. This is one reason more than four in 10 people indicate they plan to claim Social Security between the ages of 62 and 65. By contrast, just 10% plan to wait until 70.
While it may seem smart to collect benefits ASAP in such a scenario, this is actually the worst possible reason to claim Social Security early. Here's why.
Making decisions related to Social Security because of a fear you won't get any benefits at all is a short-sighted choice that could cost you thousands of dollars. There are a few reasons for that.
Despite popular belief, Social Security is not in danger of running out of money. It has a steady revenue stream that comes from current workers' payroll taxes. This is not going to stop happening unless everyone in the U.S. stops working or unless the funding mechanism is changed -- which is extremely unlikely to occur.
It is true, however, that Social Security's trust fund is in danger of depletion by 2033. But if that happens, there would still be enough money coming from tax revenue to pay about 77% of the benefits promised. That's a hit, but it doesn't mean you won't get any of your retirement funds
Can I collect Social Security yet?It depends on when you were born.
Claiming Social Security early guarantees a smaller monthly check
The reality is, an early Social Security claim is going to mean you definitely get a smaller monthly benefit.
That's because you will get hit with early filing penalties if you claim before FRA. These could shrink your monthly checks by as much as 30% depending on how far ahead of schedule you start payments. And if you wait until FRA but not until age 70, you'll pass up delayed retirement credits that increase your monthly benefit up to 8% for each full year that you delay payments.
You do give up income by waiting to get benefits, but the majority of retirees are better off waiting until 70 because the larger monthly checks from claiming at that age add up to higher lifetime income from Social Security.
So, unless there are clear reasons why you want your benefits early -- such as concerns about your health or a desire to retire early that hinges on Social Security -- you should think very carefully before you make that choice. And definitely don't claim benefits prematurely out of fear of a future without them as that's unlikely to happen.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets"
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Botched's Dr. Terry Dubrow Issues Warning on Weight Loss Surgeries After Lisa Marie Presley Death
- What to Know About Suspected Long Island Serial Killer Rex Heuermann
- Inside Penelope Disick's 11th Birthday Trip to Hawaii With Pregnant Mom Kourtney Kardashian and Pals
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Cities Stand to Win Big With the Inflation Reduction Act. How Do They Turn This Opportunity Into Results?
- Carbon Removal Projects Leap Forward With New Offset Deal. Will They Actually Help the Climate?
- Lawsuit Asserting the ‘Rights of Salmon’ Ends in a Settlement That Benefits The Fish
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Wildfire Haze Adds To New York’s Climate Change Planning Needs
Ranking
- 'Most Whopper
- Supreme Court Sharply Limits the EPA’s Ability to Protect Wetlands
- Gigi Hadid Released After Being Arrested for Marijuana in Cayman Islands
- Supreme Court Declines to Hear Appeals From Fossil Fuel Companies in Climate Change Lawsuits
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Sister Wives' Gwendlyn Brown Marries Beatriz Queiroz
- California Bill Would Hit Oil Companies With $1 Million Penalty for Health Impacts
- In the Florida Panhandle, a Black Community’s Progress Is Threatened by a Proposed Liquified Natural Gas Plant
Recommendation
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Climate Activists Protest the Museum of Modern Art’s Fossil Fuel Donors Outside Its Biggest Fundraising Gala
Ariana Grande Joined by Wicked Costar Jonathan Bailey and Andrew Garfield at Wimbledon
Log and Burn, or Leave Alone? Indiana Residents Fight US Forest Service Over the Future of Hoosier National Forest
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
James Cameron Denies He's in Talks to Make OceanGate Film After Titanic Sub Tragedy
Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian Says Bye Bye to Haters While Blocking Negative Accounts
Stop Buying Expensive Button Downs, I Have This $24 Shirt in 4 Colors and It Has 3,400+ 5-Star Reviews